High levels of blood glucose during pregnancy cause complications such as
macrosomia and neonatal health problems. Intermittent finger-prick tests and
HbA1c levels are usually ineffective at detecting sudden changes and glycemia
spikes. We prepared a systematic review of the literature from Jan-2016 to Nov-
2025, which evaluates whether Continuous Glucose Monitoring (CGM) yields better
results than the common standard of care in Type 1 Diabetes (T1D) and Gestational
Diabetes Mellitus (GDM). The goal was to determine if using this technology
reduced the incidence of large-for-gestational-age (LGA) infants and whether Timein-
Range (TIR) is a better predictor of fetal health than the traditional HbA1c
marker. For the T1D, the data are clear. CGM has emerged as the standard,
consistently fostering glycemic stability needed to curb excessive birth weight. In
GDM, the therapeutic value of the CGM and the systems used depends on the
timing of the intervention. It has the greatest impact when deployed during the
early gestational window or utilized as the primary driver for insulin titration. An
important finding across all groups is that TIR is a far more accurate predictor of
fetal growth than HbA1c, which can often appear normal even when dangerous
glucose spikes are occurring. The shift from intermittent to continuous monitoring
is a major improvement in obstetric care. CGM allows for the detection of hidden
high and low blood sugar trends that standard testing misses. This review supports
the expanded adoption of CGM in diabetic pregnancies.
Keywords: Continuous Glucose Monitoring, Type 1 Diabetes, Gestational Diabetes
Mellitus, Time in Range (TIR).
