Background: AHF is one of the most frequent diagnosis in ED hospitalized
patients. AHF diagnosis in ED patients is difficult, and the condition's show high
frequency in the emergency room. This study's aim to systematically review the
operational characteristics of the diagnostic tools used by emergency physicians
diagnose AHF. Method: We conducted a systematic review of studies that
examined the characteristics of the tests utilized by emergency physicians to
diagnose AHF in patients who present with dyspnea in the ED. The systematic
review was conducted according to the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic
Review and Meta-analyses (PRISMA) standards. PubMed, Scopus, and EMBASE
were used to search the medical literature between January 2016 and October
2024. Result and conclusion: Five publications were included in this systematic
review. ADHF is better diagnosed using natriuretic peptides. Low-cost methods
for identifying ADHF include BIA and IVCu, particularly in older patients with
renal failure. BNP testing can accurately diagnose heart failure, but it has no
discernible effect in diagnosing patients with dyspnea. The creation of BNP
nomograms that are modified for HF history, age, gender, and ethnicity may
increase the usefulness of BNP in the emergency department. AHFS-related acute
dyspnea and pulmonary-related acute dyspnea may be distinguished with more
accuracy with LCI integrated ultrasonography than with other techniques.
Although LCI integrated ultrasonography is helpful for quickly evaluating acute
dyspnea in the emergency department, more study is needed to determine how it
affects diagnosis and decision-making.
Keywords: Emergency physician, acute heart failure, diagnosis
