Background: Tympanic membrane perforation can be repaired surgically by
various methods of tympanoplasty, restoring middle ear function and hearing.
The purpose of this review was to contrast various surgical techniques used to
treat tympanic membrane perforations. Method: From 2018 to 2022, the PubMed,
Embase, and Cochrane Library databases were screened as part of a systematic
search. The authors independently found the studies that met the requirements
for selection. Every contributor evaluated the whole text of the selected articles.
Outcomes and study features were documented. Results: Three treatment groups
had CT, two had FGM, five had TFT, and seven had BCT. There was variation in
the closure rates in the TFT groups (mean 83.2%), BCT groups (mean 91.2), CT
groups (mean 88.3), and FGM groups (mean 87%). In the TFT, the closure rates
ranged from 83% to 96% (mean 83.2%). The closure rate statistics indicate that
BCT has higher closure rates than TFT, CT, and FGM. The BCT and other surgical
procedures did not significantly differ from one another for hearing
improvement, showing that the hearing benefits from these treatments were
equivalent. The six papers in total indicated improvements in hearing. Conclusion:
When correcting tiny to medium-sized TM perforations, butterfly cartilage
tympanoplasty works satisfactorily. In addition, this approach is highly tolerated
and results in a shorter recovery period and postoperative pain.
Keywords: Surgical techniques, tympanic membrane perforation, surgical repair