Background: IMT has already been shown to benefit patients with HF; however, it
is unclear which patients benefit most from this intervention and what kind of
training is most effective. We aimed to review the impact of IMT on respiratory
muscle strength, pulmonary function, functional ability, dyspnea, and Qol in HF
patients. Method: This systematic review was planned and carried out using the
PRISMA guidelines. MEDLINE, EMBASE, and the Cochrane Central Register of
Controlled Trials were searched databases. In addition, a thorough search of the
references of earlier studies on the subject was carried out. To locate publications
published between 2011 and 2024, the search terms "heart failure" and "breathing
exercises" were used. Result: we included eight trials totaling 299 patients.
Isolated IMT was performed in five trials and contrasted with control groups.
Two of these studies included participants with inspiratory muscle weakness.
Three trials involved four to six weeks of training during the intervention phase.
Three experiments combined IMT with an additional intervention; two of these
investigations combined aerobic training and neuromuscular electrical
stimulation. One study utilized a load as high as 60% of MIP, while two used
loads as high as 30% of inspiratory muscle strength. Conclusion: In patients with
respiratory and muscular insufficiency, training loads larger than 60% and longer
intervention durations increased inspiratory muscle strength, functional ability,
and quality of life more after isolated IMT.
Keywords: Heart failure, inspiratory muscle training, fatigue, dyspnea