Background: When evaluating blunt abdominal trauma patients initially, it is
important to do an extended assessment using with solography exam. This study
aimed to conduct a comprehensive analysis of the current literature concerning
the diagnostic accuracy of all aspects of trauma assessment utilizing solography
examination. Method: A comprehensive review of the literature about emergency
department studies examining the diagnostic efficacy of contrast enhanced and
conventional ultrasonography performed before CT imaging for abdominal
injuries was carried out across large databases. The PRISMA statement was
adhered to by the study. The research included in the literature search were
released between 2007 and 2023. Result: The organ that was examined the most
was the liver, while the organ that was investigated the least was the pancreas. Of
the included studies three showed a variety of abdominal injury types, including
the presence of free abdominal fluid, continuous bleeding, and solid organ
damage signs. CEUS is more accurate than baseline US and almost as sensitive as
CT. CT is more precise and sensitive than contrast enhanced US in identifying
prognostic indicators such urinoma and current bleeding. Contrast enhanced US
should be considered in the evaluation and follow-up of children who have
experienced traumatic abdominal injuries. Conclusion: When utilised as the initial
examination in the emergency room, CEUS had a higher diagnostic value than
conventional ultrasound for discriminating blunt abdominal trauma.
Keywords: Blunt abdominal trauma, assessment, emergency department,
ultrasonography