Objective: To compare the efficacy and safety of Holmium enucleation of the prostate (HoLEP) versus Bipolar transurethral resection
of the prostate (BTURP) in the management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. Methods: In our randomized controlled trial, 60 patients
were allocated into 2 equal groups representing HoLEP and BTURP. Perioperative data were collected regarding the prostate size,
post voiding residual urine (PVRU), international prostate symptom score (IPSS), peak urine flow rate (Qmax), and Quality of life
affection (QoL). Operative parameters were recorded according to operative, enucleation, and resection time in addition to the
volume of resected tissues and intraoperative complication. Patients were followed up at 1 and 12 months postoperative by PVRU,
IPSS, Qmax, and QoL assessment. Results: Sixty patients finished our follow up period and their data were analyzed. The mean
prostate size was 74.23 ± 9.58 ml and 72.6 ± 10.01 ml for HoLEP and BTURP groups respectively. Operative efficacy measures were
comparable in both groups. HoLEP was associated with an earlier catheter removal time of 1.07 ± 0.25 days compared to 3.07 ± 0.78
days in the BTURP. Postoperative PSA, IPSS, QoL, PVRU, and Qmax were comparable in both groups and they both showed
statistically significant improvement in the aforementioned parameters following treatment. There was no statistically significant
difference between both groups regarding the complication rate. Conclusion: Both HoLEP and BTURP are safe and effective in the
surgical management of benign prostatic hyperplasia. However, HoLEP has an early catheter removal, and shorter hospital stay.
Keywords: Enucleation, prostate, holmium laser, bipolar, endoscopy, lower
urinary tract symptoms, prostatic hyperplasia