Introduction: Pain is one of the major postoperative problems, and lack of proper pain management can lead to complications such
as increased hospital stay, increased recovery time and more medical costs. There are several methods used to control postoperative
pain, the most common of which are administration of analgesics and local anaesthetics at the site of surgery. Therefore,
considering the reported side effects, this study tends to investigate the effect of two local anesthetic methods in patients
undergoing herniorrafia. Materials & Methods: This study was performed as a clinical trial on 60 patients undergoing herniorrafia in
Shariati Hospital of Tehran in 2018. All patients underwent general anesthesia and Liechtenstein. Patients were randomly divided
into three groups: marcain, lidocaine, and control. Then, severity of pain was assessed based on VAS after one hour, in the afternoon
on the operation day and the day after the operation. Frequency of prescribing pethidine was recorded based on VAS. Statistical
analysis of the collected data was performed by one way ANOVA. Results: Three groups were not significantly different in terms of
age. Pairwise comparison of groups revealed that severity of pain at the end of surgery and in the afternoon of the operation day
was significantly different between marcain group and lidocaine group as well as postoperative marcain group and the control
group (P=0.001); however, pain severity was not significantly different between lidocaine and control groups. Conclusion: marcain
administration at the surgical incision site compared to lidocaine reduces pain severity and reduces the average administration of
pethidine in patients.
Keywords: Herniorrafia, Marcain, Lidocaine