Background: Intractable elevated intracranial pressure can lead to mortality or irreversible neurological brain damage. Thus,
monitoring of intracranial pressure becomes a necessity in many traumatic and non-traumatic brain lesions. Potential risks and
complications of monitoring include bleeding, bacterial infections, and injury due to probe misplacement. Objective: to identify and
assess the complications related to intraparenchymal transducer intracranial pressure (ICP) monitoring at King Saud Medical City
(KSMC) in Riyadh, KSA. Design: This is a retrospective cohort study. Setting: the neurosurgery department at King Saud Medical City
(KSMC). Patients (Materials) and Methods: This is a retrospective cohort study, which was performed from January 2016 until
December 2018. Patients were recruited from the neurosurgery department at King Saud Medical City (KSMC). The patients were 14
years of age and older and used an intraparenchymal transducer ICP monitoring device during their admission. The collection sheet
covered the following topics: socio-demographic variables, age at admission, gender, chronic diseases, indications, CT diagnosis and
complications associated with intraparenchymal transducer ICP monitoring devices, GCS score at admission and discharge, and
whether there Main Outcome Measures: complication rates due to ICP transducer monitoring. Sample size: 106 patients. Results: A
total of 88.7% of patients did not have any complications. However, at the surgical site of intraparenchymal ICP monitoring insertion,
7.5% of patients developed wound infections, 1.9% of patients developed leakage, and 0.9% of patients developed both wound
infections and leakage. Conclusion: The complication rates due to ICP transducer monitoring were low. Specifically, 88.7% of the
patients did not have any complication, whereas 10.3% of the patients showed minor complications without serious consequences.
These complications were treated immediately after they were diagnosed. Limitations: no limitation. Conflict of interest: Authors have
no conflict of interest.
Keywords: ICP, monitoring devices, complications