Tearing the ACL is a major setback for athletes, especially those in pivoting sports
like skiing and football. For years, surgeons relied almost entirely on BPTB and
hamstring grafts. Lately, though, many are shifting toward quadriceps tendon
grafts to reduce chronic muscle weakness, stubborn donor-site pain, and high retear
rates seen in younger patients. This paper will focus on the analysis of current
research on quadriceps grafts and their performance compared with traditional
grafts. We analyzed data gathered through a literature search in databases from
January 2016 to March 2026. After analyzing data on almost 19,000 cases in
registries and trials, one can conclude that quadriceps grafts are as good as
traditional grafts in terms of failure rates (around 2.2-3.1%) and joint stability. The
primary advantage of the quadriceps graft lies in patient comfort. It reduces
anterior knee pain down to 7.2%, a substantial decrease from the 28.4% seen with
BPTB grafts. Looking at soft-tissue versus bone-block setups, the outcomes and
failure rates look pretty much identical. Also, in children and adolescents, soft
tissue quadriceps grafts had a significantly lower risk of rupture (3.5%) compared to
hamstrings (12.4%), without compromising growth plate injury. The quadriceps
tendon is a versatile and dependable option for primary ACL reconstruction. From
our clinical analysis, it is evident that the graft selection should capitalize on these
unique features.
Keywords: ACL Reconstruction, Quadriceps Tendon, Bone-Patellar Tendon-Bone,
Hamstring Tendon, Donor-Site Morbidity, Pediatric ACL, Return to Sport
