Dentists now utilize clear aligners and adjunctive therapies, such as botulinum
toxin, to treat heavy occlusal forces during orthodontic treatment. There is some
evidence suggesting that applying light, continuous forces while protecting
occlusion with an occlusal guard (or other protective appliances) enables safe tooth
movement in patients with severe bruxism. In this research, there is an attempt to
differentiate between the clinical situations, which guarantee good prognosis for
orthodontic forces in bruxing patients, and those, which are considered poor.
Through literature review, this paper tries to determine the real clinical limits for
orthodontic forces. Studies found that modern appliances are indicated for bruxing
patients, with success rates comparable to those of traditional orthodontic therapies.
They are a highly effective alternative in preventing external apical root resorption
(EARR) and managing muscle-related joint pain. With neuromuscular
modifications, it is now possible to achieve stable tooth alignment in patients with
heavy grinding. In many cases, unmanaged temporomandibular joint pain is a
contraindication for active movement due to the threat of iatrogenic complications
during force application. The long-term interaction between aligned teeth and
continuous grinding forces is unpredictable. Some evidence suggests a risk of late
relapse. Managing orthodontic patients with bruxism is a reliable treatment in
specific scenarios. It is a predictable treatment when using light continuous forces
and hybrid retention. Bruxism management in orthodontics is a rapidly changing
field that needs attention from practitioners. Recent progress shows potential, but
more studies are required to make these protocols the new standard.
Keywords: bruxism; bruxism during sleep; orthodontic treatment; clear aligner
therapy; root resorption
